The gun is not to blame it is purely an object with no capability to harm anyone unless used by the wrong person. And who is to decide who should have guns? The liberals who hate the right? or only have the government have guns making this place even more tyrannical? The fact of the matter is that the laws in place now are good and no one should be able to deny anyone the ability to protect ones self which is what liberals are proposing because liberals blame an object for something when they should be blaming the person. And why are liberals focussing on guns? Cars kill three times the amount of people guns do. Should we ban all cars now? The liberal argument is illogical and threatens freedom at the foundation. The freedom that shouts “I have a right to defend myself, those I love, and my own property!” I stand for the second amendment, our forefathers were much smarter than these fearfully sculling liberals and if they get their way tyranny will rule because people won’t be able to stand against it. I want a free America!
Those who believe that the second amendment is for muskets are dead wrong and honestly would have to think that the founding fathers must have been full on idiots since in order to believe such nonsense you would have to think that they didn’t think the technology of guns would advance. Also, if the second amendment was only for muskets Thomas Jefferson would have never authorized a privately owned ship to have full on artillery cannons on it. Here’s why those who say the second amendment is only for muskets are 100% wrong and just need to stop talking because they are misinforming the people:
Many liberals try and use the term “well regulated” to mean that the government needs to rule over. But here’s what “well regulated” means:
I finish this comment with a quote by Gandhi:
“Among the many misdeeds of the British rule in India, history will look upon the Act depriving a whole nation of arms as the blackest.”
“Don’t Tread on Me!”